🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

The Baltic nation's lawmakers have decided to pull out from an global treaty created to protect women from abuse, covering family violence, following extensive and intense debates in the legislature.

Thousands of demonstrators gathered in the capital this week to oppose the vote. The final decision now lies with Head of State the nation's president, who must decide whether to endorse or reject the legislation.

Referred to as the Istanbul Convention, the 2011 agreement only took effect in the Baltic state last twelve months ago, requiring authorities to develop laws and assistance programs to eliminate all types of abuse.

The Baltic nation has become the first EU country to initiate the procedure of exiting from the treaty. The transcontinental nation pulled out in 2021, a move that rights groups described as a major regression for women's rights.

Ideological Debate and Opposition

The international agreement was ratified by the EU in last year, yet traditionalist groups have argued that its emphasis on gender equality weakens family values and advances what they term "gender ideology".

Following a thirteen-hour debate in the Saeima, lawmakers voted by a margin of 56-32 to withdraw from the convention, a action sponsored by opposition parties but supported by politicians from one of the three governing partners.

The result represents a defeat for moderate conservative government leader Evika Silina, who stood with demonstrators outside the legislature earlier this seven-day period. "We will not surrender, we will continue fighting so that abuse does not triumph," she declared to the assembly.

Political Disagreements and Reactions

One of the primary political groups supporting the withdrawal is a nationalist party, whose head has called on the public to choose between what he terms a "traditional family unit" and "gender ideology with various gender identities".

Latvia's human rights commissioner Karina Palkova urged the agreement not to be politicized, while the group the rights organization stated it was "not a threat to Latvian values, it served as a tool to achieve them".

The Thursday's vote has provoked broad protest both within the country and internationally.

Twenty-two thousand individuals have signed a Latvian appeal demanding the convention to be maintained. The women's rights organization Centrs Marta has called a demonstration for next Thursday, accusing MPs of ignoring the wishes of the nation's citizens.

International Concerns and Possible Next Steps

The head of the Council of Europe's parliamentary assembly stated that the Baltic state had made a rash decision driven by false information. He characterized it as an "never-before-seen and extremely worrying regression for women's rights and fundamental freedoms in the continent".

He added that since the transcontinental nation abandoned the treaty in 2021, instances of gender-based killings and violence against women had risen sharply.

Because the vote did not secure a two-thirds majority, the head of state could possibly send back the legislation for further consideration if he has concerns.

Head of State the national leader announced on digital platforms that he would assess the vote according to legal requirements, "taking into account governmental and judicial considerations, instead of belief-based viewpoints".

Last week, another member of the governing alliance, the Progressives, suggested it would not exclude appealing to the supreme judicial body.

"This vote represents a worrisome development for women's rights not only in Latvia but across the continent," commented a rights advocate.

• Domestic abuse rates have been increasing in several EU nations
• The European treaty mandates specific safeguards for victims of domestic abuse
• Latvia's decision could affect comparable debates in other member states