🔗 Share this article

Established parties in power are more and more enabling the radical right to dictate the public discourse, according to a recent study conducted in Germany.

Academics discovered that this trend has inadvertently helped far-right groups by legitimising their viewpoints and disseminating them to a broader audience.

Study Drawing from Over 20 Years of Media Coverage

The results, released in the academic journal on political studies, relied on an computerized content review of more than 520,000 articles from six German publications.

Capital-based scholars noted that as the far right moved from fringe issues in the 1990s era to core themes like assimilation and migration, established political groups increasingly adapted their messaging in response.

This adaptation amplified the dissemination of these concepts and signaled to voters that such positions were legitimate.

Implications for Democratic Systems

"Public communication by established political groups is crucial in the voting performance of the far right," explained a political sociologist involved in the research.

"This element has been overlooked," she noted.

The impact was noticeable even when conventional parties were condemning the radical faction. "You're still giving them attention," the researcher commented. "The main point is that because we live in such a battle for attention, this attention is key."

Normalisation Effect Across the Continent

While the research was focused on Germany, this mainstreaming phenomenon is likely to apply to nations across Europe.

"This is frequently observed in German and British media," said another co-author. "Radical groups says something and everybody begins discussing it for several days."

"Although you're opposing it, you're repeating it," he stated.

Toughening of Public Rhetoric

At certain points, political figures have also toughened their discourse to align with that of the radical right.

In a recent interview, a then German chancellor advocated large-scale deportations and pushed for them to happen "more often and faster."

Comparable examples can be observed throughout Europe, as politicians from countries including the United Kingdom to the French Republic adopt the language of the far right, particularly on immigration.

This has created an feedback loop that was unthinkable a ten years prior.

Central Issue: Who Sets the Agenda?

"{If you're a moderate party and you are talking about societal topics – migration, assimilation – in a way that is determined by the pace of the far right, that's the essence of agenda setting," clarified a researcher.

Some political parties have taken additional measures, attempting to emulate the strict agenda of the radical right, despite research suggests that doing so leads the electorate to vote for the far right.

Progressive Impact and Public Perception

The extent of information collected showed that the impact of far-right parties had been progressive and had increased with the passage of time.

"Public perception doesn't change from day to day," stated a researcher. "But if you hear this negative framing around immigration every second week, and it is being disseminated not only by radical groups but also, for instance, by established parties, then of course this narrative gains more traction."

Need for Established Parties to Develop Their Own Narratives

The study highlighted the need for established political parties to carve out their own narratives, especially on subjects such as immigration and integration, instead of continuously following the radical right.

"It's like a dance," said one researcher. "If the conductor is far-right and you're reacting to it, you cannot decide which music should be heard."